Compare Toyota RAV4 V (XA50) vs Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50) vs Toyota C-HR facelift

Toyota RAV4 V (XA50)

Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)

Toyota C-HR facelift

Toyota RAV4 V (XA50)Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)Toyota C-HR facelift
Variants
2.0 149
2.0 149 AWD CVT
2.0 149 CVT
2.0 175
2.0 175 AWD
2.0 175 AWD CVT
2.0 175 CVT
2.5 200 AWD AT
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid AWD (US)
2.5 Hybrid AWD
2.5 D-4S PHEV AWD
RAV4 Prime
RAV4 TRD
1.2
1.2 4WD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 AT
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid

Reviews

Neofiliac score48%28%42%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent styling
  • Decent exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption (hybrid)
  • Small turning circle
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Uninspiring
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Just a clumsy hatchback
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Impractical

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.