HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Toyota C-HR facelift vs Nissan Qashqai 3 vs Toyota Yaris Cross

Variants
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid
1.3 140
1.3 158
1.3 AWD CVT
1.3 CVT
1.5
1.5 4WD
1.5 Hybrid
1.5 Hybrid E-Four

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 298 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 281 mm
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
26.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
215/60 R17 96H, 225/50 R18 95H
215/50 R18
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door mild-hybrid Crossover
Platform
Nissan CMF-C platform
TNGA: GA-B

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1565 mm / 61.6 in
1625 mm / 64.0 in
1590 mm / 62.6 in
Size | Length
4390 mm / 172.8 in
4425 mm / 174.2 in
4180 mm / 164.6 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1835 mm / 72.2 in | 2084 mm / 82.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
18 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2665 mm / 104.9 in
2560 mm / 100.8 in

Powertrain

Emission Standard
EURO 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.3 L / 81.3 cu-in / 1332.0 cc
1.5 L / 90.9 cu-in / 1490.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
81.3 mm / 3.2 in
97.6 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2020
2021
2020
Debut
2021-02-18
2020-04-23
Made In
UK
Japan, France

Reviews

Neofiliac score
42%
3%
9%
Pros
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Cheap to buy
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good reliability
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Impractical
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible build quality
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Waste of raw materials
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic equipment
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor handling
  • Bland

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.