Compare Jeep Renegade facelift vs Ford Explorer 6 vs Ford Kuga 2

Variants
1.0 T-GDI 120
1.3 T-GDI 180 4x4 AT
1.3 Turbo 150 DCT
1.3 Turbo 190 4xe AT
1.3 Turbo 240 4xe AT
1.6 Multijet 120
1.6 Multijet 120 DCT
2.0 Multijet 140 4x4
2.0 Multijet 140 4x4 AT
2.0 Multijet 170 4x4 AT
2.4 MultiAir2 182 4x4 AT
2.4 MultiAir2 182 AT
2.3 EcoBoost 300
2.3 EcoBoost 300 AWD
3.0 EcoBoost 457 PHEV AWD
3.3 Cyclone 322 Hybrid
3.0 EcoBoost 365 AWD
ST 3.0 EcoBoost 400 AWD
1.5 120
1.5 150
1.5 182 4x4 AT
1.5 TDCI 120
1.5 TDCI 120 AT
1.6 150
1.6 150 4x4 AT
1.6 182 4x4 AT
2.0 242 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140 4x4
2.0 TDCi 140 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCI 150
2.0 TDCI 150 4x4
2.0 TDCI 150 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCi 163 4x4
2.0 TDCi 163 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCI 180 4x4
2.0 TDCI 180 4x4 AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
6.4 L / 6.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
769 kg / 1695 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.6 m / 41.3 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Water Fording
400 mm / 15.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.4 kWh (gross)
13.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Track Width | Front
1699.0 mm / 66.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1699.0 mm / 66.9 in
Wheelbase
2570 mm / 101.2 in
3025 mm / 119.1 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
6.0 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
5.7 sec
CO2 Emission
66 g/km
Fuel Economy
2.9 L/100km / 81.1 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
230.0 km/h / 142.9 mph

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP-ISC
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm
Transmission | Gears
10-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
69%
19%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Athletic styling
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Short full-electric range
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts at all four corners
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Uglier than the original
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.