Compare Jeep Renegade facelift vs Chevrolet Trailblazer 3 vs Chevrolet Captiva

Chevrolet Trailblazer 3 Crossover (2020)

Chevrolet Captiva / Holden Captiva Crossover (2006-2018)

Jeep | Cars

Chevrolet | Cars

Variants

1.0 T-GDI 120

1.3 T-GDI 180 4x4 AT

1.3 Turbo 150 DCT

1.3 Turbo 190 4xe AT

1.3 Turbo 240 4xe AT

1.6 Multijet 120

1.6 Multijet 120 DCT

2.0 Multijet 140 4x4

2.0 Multijet 140 4x4 AT

2.0 Multijet 170 4x4 AT

2.4 MultiAir2 182 4x4 AT

2.4 MultiAir2 182 AT

1.2 CVT

1.3 AWD AT

1.3 CVT

ACTIV 1.3 AWD AT

ACTIV 1.3 CVT

RS 1.3 AWD AT

RS 1.3 CVT

2.0 VCDi 127

2.0 VCDi 127 AWD

2.0 VCDi 150

2.0 VCDi 150 AWD

2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT

2.2 VCDi 163

2.2 VCDi 163 AT

2.2 VCDi 163 AWD

2.2 VCDi 184 AT

2.2 VCDi 184 AWD

2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT

2.4

2.4 AWD

2.4 AWD AT

2.4 Ecotec 167

2.4 Ecotec 167 AT

2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD

2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT

3.0 AWD AT

3.2 AWD AT

Sport 2.4 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

716 L / 25.3 cu-ft ~ 1540 L / 54.4 cu-ft

Coolant Capacity

6.4 L / 6.8 qt

Engine Oil Capacity

5.2 L / 5.5 qt

Fuel Capacity

50.0 L / 13.2 gal

Passengers

5 / 7

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Disc

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

18.2 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

22.7 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

MacPherson strut

Semi-independent, Torsion

Multi-link

Turning Circle

11.4 m / 37.4 ft

Water Fording

400 mm / 15.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity

11.4 kWh (gross)

Body Style

5-door SUV

Dimensions

Size | Width

1808 mm / 71.2 in

Track Width | Rear

1557.0 mm / 61.3 in

Wheelbase

2570 mm / 101.2 in

2640 mm / 103.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.38

Towing Capacity

495 kg / 1091 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Engine | Redline

6400 rpm

Engine | Type

Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-3 DOHC engine

Production

Availability

2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score

11%

45%

Pros

Low fuel consumption

Easy to park

Reasonable drivetrain reliability
Good towing capacity

Cons

Very ugly
No powerful engine options
Short full-electric range
Stuck with MacPherson struts at all four corners

No powerful engine options
Ugly
Crossover nonsense
Basic suspension setup

Very ugly
Bad 0-100kph time
High 0.38 drag coefficient
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.