Compare Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Kia Niro vs Kia Sorento 4
Variants
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
1.6 GDI Hybrid
1.6 GDI Euro6d Hybrid
1.6 GDI PHEV
1.6 GDI Euro6d PHEV
1.6 T-GDi Hybrid
1.6 T-GDi Hybrid AWD
1.6 T-GDI PHEV AWD
2.2 CRDi AWD DCT
2.2 CRDi DCT
2.5 GDI AT
2.5 GDI AWD AT
2.5 T-GDI AWD DCT
2.5 T-GDI DCT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
6.0 L / 6.3 qt
Passengers
5
5
5 / 6 / 7
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
16.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double wishbone
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Lithium-polymer
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
360.0 V
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
Size | Height
1678 mm / 66.1 in
Size | Length
4797 mm / 188.9 in
4355 mm / 171.5 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
36 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
58.0 km / 36.0 mi
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
Towing Capacity
600 kg / 1323 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
G4LE
G4FT
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
72.0 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
97.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Torque
147 Nm / 108.4 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm + 170 Nm / 125.4 lb-ft @ 0-1798 rpm
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Double clutch transmission (DCT)
Production
Availability
2020
2020 Q3
Debut
2020-03-18
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
38%
48%
Pros
- Some interesting engine options
- More reliable than the bigger RRs
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good exterior styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Decent styling
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- High cargo capacity
Cons
- Crossover nonsense
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Crossover nonsense
- Long-term drivetrain reliability concerns
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.