HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Volvo XC60 II vs Range Rover Velar L560 facelift

Variants
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400

Capacity

Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
21.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
19.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in
530 mm / 20.9 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
18.8 kWh (gross)
17.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
216 mm / 8.5 in
Size | Height
1678 mm / 66.1 in
1658 mm / 65.3 in
1678 mm / 66.1 in
Size | Length
4797 mm / 188.9 in
4797 mm / 188.9 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2874 mm / 113.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
18.6 km / 11.6 mi
53.0 km / 32.9 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic Geartronic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2020
2017
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
67%
57%
67%
Pros
  • Some interesting engine options
  • More reliable than the bigger RRs
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Some interesting engine options
  • More reliable than the bigger RRs
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Crossover nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.