Compare Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Acura ZDX vs Acura MDX 3
Variants
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
3.0 Hybrid AWD
3.5 6AT
3.5 9AT
3.5 AWD 9AT
3.5 AWD 6AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
779 L / 27.5 cu-ft ~ 1971 L / 69.6 cu-ft
447 L / 15.8 cu-ft ~ 2574 L / 90.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
79.5 L / 21.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
P255/50 R19 103H
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
185 mm / 7.3 in
Size | Height
1678 mm / 66.1 in
1596 mm / 62.8 in
Size | Length
4797 mm / 188.9 in
4887 mm / 192.4 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
1995 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1684.0 mm / 66.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
1719.0 mm / 67.7 in
1684.0 mm / 66.3 in
Weight
2019.0 kg / 4451.1 lbs
Wheel Size
8.5J x 19
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2820 mm / 111.0 in
Performance
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Fuel Economy
12.4 L/100km / 19.0 MPG (combined) | 14.7 L/100km / 16.0 MPG (urban) | 10.2 L/100km / 23.1 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Engine
J37A5
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.2:1
Engine | Power
300.0 hp / 223.7 kW @ 6300 rpm
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
366 Nm / 269.9 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
2009 ~ 2013
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
13%
65%
Pros
- Some interesting engine options
- More reliable than the bigger RRs
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Reliable V6 engine
- Much improved exterior styling
- Good engine reliability
- High cargo capacity
Cons
- Crossover nonsense
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Rather ugly and pointless
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.