Compare Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Audi Q2 GA facelift vs Range Rover Evoque Coupe
Variants
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
30 TFSI
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
Si4 240PS AWD 6AT
Si4 240PS AWD 9AT
Si4 285PS AWD 9AT
TD4 150PS
TD4 150PS AWD
TD4 150PS AWD AT
TD4 180PS AWD
TD4 180PS AWD AT
eD4
SD4 190PS AWD
SD4 190PS 4WD 6AT
SD4 190PS AWD 9AT
TD4 150PS AWD AT
TD4 150PS AWD
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
565 kg / 1246 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/60R16
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
11.3 m / 37.1 ft
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV
3-door Crossover
Platform
Volkswagen MQB
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
215 mm / 8.5 in
Size | Height
1678 mm / 66.1 in
Size | Length
4797 mm / 188.9 in
4208 mm / 165.7 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
1794 mm / 70.6 in | 2009 mm / 79.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1629.0 mm / 64.1 in
Wheel Size
6J x 16
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2601 mm / 102.4 in
2660 mm / 104.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
74.5 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.5:1
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
76.4 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Type
Inline-4
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed / 7-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Manual / S tronic DCT
Production
Availability
2020
2020
Debut
2020-09
Made In
Germany, China, Algeria
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
12%
8%
Pros
- Some interesting engine options
- More reliable than the bigger RRs
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent engine reliability
- Good towing capacity
- So ugly that many thought it had character
Cons
- Crossover nonsense
- Horrible performance
- No powerful engine options
- Crossover nonsense
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Very tight inside
- Low cargo capacity
- Bad drivetrain
- MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad ZF 9HP transmission
- Pretends to be "SUV"
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.