Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Peugeot 4008 vs Peugeot 508 RXH
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.6 HDi
1.8 HDi
2.0 BlueHDi AT
2.0 HDi Hybrid AT
2.0 HDi Hybrid AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
416 L / 14.7 cu-ft ~ 1196 L / 42.2 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.5 L / 5.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
15.6 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
19.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
225/55 R18
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
184 mm / 7.2 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1635 mm / 64.4 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4340 mm / 170.9 in
Size | Width
1840 mm / 72.4 in
Track Width | Front
1592.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1564.0 mm / 61.6 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2815 mm / 110.8 in
Performance
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
5.0 km / 3.1 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1100 kg / 2425 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
DW10CTED4
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1997.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
88.0 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic
Production
Availability
2012 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
26%
25%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Fully independent suspension setup
- Not very ugly
Cons
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Uglier than the standard 508 SW
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.