Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Peugeot 3008 II vs Peugeot 508 RXH
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.2 130 AT
1.2 130
1.5 HDi 130 AT
1.5 HDi 130
1.6 HDi 100
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 180 AT
1.6 PHEV
1.6 THP 165 AT
2.0 HDi 150
GT 2.0 HDi 177
GT 2.0 HDi 180
2.0 BlueHDi AT
2.0 HDi Hybrid AT
2.0 HDi Hybrid AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1482 L / 52.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.5 L / 5.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.0 deg
15.6 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
29.0 deg
19.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.0 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.2 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
219 mm / 8.6 in
184 mm / 7.2 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4447 mm / 175.1 in
Size | Width
1841 mm / 72.5 in | 2098 mm / 82.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1906 mm / 75.0 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1592.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1564.0 mm / 61.6 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2815 mm / 110.8 in
Performance
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
5.0 km / 3.1 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1100 kg / 2425 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Engine
DW10CTED4
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1997.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
88.0 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
21%
25%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Low fuel consumption
- Not very ugly
Cons
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Uglier than the standard 508 SW
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.