Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Kia Sorento 4
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
1.6 T-GDi Hybrid
1.6 T-GDi Hybrid AWD
1.6 T-GDI PHEV AWD
2.2 CRDi AWD DCT
2.2 CRDi DCT
2.5 GDI AT
2.5 GDI AWD AT
2.5 T-GDI AWD DCT
2.5 T-GDI DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5 / 6 / 7
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
16.8 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double wishbone
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1678 mm / 66.1 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4797 mm / 188.9 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2874 mm / 113.1 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
36 g/km
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine
G4FT
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
2020 Q3
Debut
2020-03-18
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
67%
48%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Some interesting engine options
- More reliable than the bigger RRs
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent styling
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- High cargo capacity
Cons
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Crossover nonsense
- Crossover nonsense
- Long-term drivetrain reliability concerns
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.