Compare Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551) vs Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50) vs Toyota C-HR facelift

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)

Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)

Toyota C-HR facelift

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)Toyota C-HR facelift
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.2
1.2 4WD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 AT
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid

Reviews

Neofiliac score27%28%42%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption (hybrid)
  • Small turning circle
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Just a clumsy hatchback
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Impractical

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.