HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Kia Soul vs Kia Sportage 2

Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.6
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi AT
2.0
2.0 AWD
2.0 AWD AT
2.0D 113 AWD
2.0D 140
2.0D 150
2.0D 150 AT
2.7 AWD
2.7 AWD AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
370 L / 13.1 cu-ft ~ 570 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
410 kg / 904 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
195/65R15
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
196 mm / 7.7 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1661 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4105 mm / 161.6 in
Size | Width
1785 mm / 70.3 in
Track Width | Front
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Weight
1270.0 kg / 2799.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.40
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
79.2 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
27%
14%
15%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Distinct styling
  • Not much
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Rather ugly
  • Slow and sluggish
  • No powerful engine options
  • High 0.40 drag coefficient

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.