Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Nissan Qashqai vs Nissan Juke

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551) Crossover (2019)

Nissan Qashqai (J10) Crossover (2007-2014)

Land Rover | Cars

Nissan | Cars

Variants

D165 AWD

D165 MT

D200 AWD

P160

P300e AWD

1.5 dCi 103

1.5 dCi 106

1.5 dCi 110

1.6 114

1.6 117

1.6 117 CVT

1.6 dCi

1.6 dCi AWD

2.0

2.0 141 Euro5 AWD

2.0 AWD

2.0 AWD CVT

2.0 CVT

2.0 dCi

2.0 dCi AWD

2.0 dCi AWD AT

2.0 dCi Euro5

2.0 dCi Euro5 AWD

2.0 dCi Euro5 AWD AT

2.0 Euro5

2.0 Euro5 AWD CVT

2.0 Euro5 CVT

1.2 DIG-T

1.5 dCi

1.5 dCi Euro6

1.5 dCi Euro6d

1.6 113PS Euro6d

1.6 113PS Euro6d CVT

1.6 117PS

1.6 117PS CVT

1.6 94PS Euro6

1.6 94PS

1.6 DIG-T

1.6 DIG-T CVT

1.6 DIG-T AWD CVT

Nismo

Nismo AWD CVT

Nismo RS AWD CVT

Nismo RS

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft

410 L / 14.5 cu-ft ~ 1513 L / 53.4 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

65.0 L / 17.2 gal

Passengers

Payload

578 kg / 1274 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs, 349 mm

Brakes | Rear

Ventilated discs, 325 mm

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

19.2 deg

22.0 deg

Offroad | Breakover Angle

17.0 deg

Offroad | Climb Angle

45.0 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

30.6 deg

30.2 deg

25.0 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Tire Size

225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21

Turning Circle

10.6 m / 34.8 ft

10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Water Fording

350 mm / 13.8 in

Construction

Body Style

5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

212 mm / 8.3 in

200 mm / 7.9 in

Size | Height

1649 mm / 64.9 in

Size | Length

4371 mm / 172.1 in

Track Width | Front

1540.0 mm / 60.6 in

Wheelbase

2681 mm / 105.6 in

2630 mm / 103.5 in

2530 mm / 99.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.35

Electric Range

68.0 km / 42.3 mi

Powertrain

Engine | Bore

83.0 mm / 3.3 in

Engine | Stroke

92.3 mm / 3.6 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score

27%

17%

Pros

Some offroad capabilities
Low fuel consumption
Good towing capacity

Decent ground clearance

So ugly it's endearing

Cons

Very ugly
FWD-based
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
No powerful engine options
Lethargic, unreliable engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Bad CVT transmissions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions
Horrible Renault engines
Bad CVT

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.