Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Nissan Juke vs Nissan Rogue 2
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.2 DIG-T
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi Euro6
1.5 dCi Euro6d
1.6 113PS Euro6d
1.6 113PS Euro6d CVT
1.6 117PS
1.6 117PS CVT
1.6 94PS Euro6
1.6 94PS
1.6 DIG-T
1.6 DIG-T CVT
1.6 DIG-T AWD CVT
Nismo
Nismo AWD CVT
Nismo RS AWD CVT
Nismo RS
2.0 AWD Hybrid CVT
2.0 Hybrid CVT
2.5 AWD CVT
2.5 CVT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
22.0 deg
17.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
18.6 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
25.0 deg
25.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
Size | Width
1839 mm / 72.4 in
Track Width | Front
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2530 mm / 99.6 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
6%
37%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- So ugly it's endearing
- Some offroad capabilities
- Improved styling
- Improved interior appointments
Cons
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible Renault engines
- Bad CVT
- No powerful engine options
- Bad engine reputation
- Unreliable CVTs
- Poor handling
- MacPherson front suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.