Compare Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551) vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe (L538) vs Mini Paceman (R61)

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe (L538)

Mini Paceman (R61)

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe (L538)Mini Paceman (R61)
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
Si4 240PS AWD 6AT
Si4 240PS AWD 9AT
Si4 285PS AWD 9AT
TD4 150PS
TD4 150PS AWD
TD4 150PS AWD AT
TD4 180PS AWD
TD4 180PS AWD AT
eD4
SD4 190PS AWD
SD4 190PS 4WD 6AT
SD4 190PS AWD 9AT
TD4 150PS AWD AT
TD4 150PS AWD
Cooper
Cooper ALL4
Cooper ALL4 AT
Cooper AT
Cooper D 1.6
Cooper D 1.6 ALL4
Cooper D 2.0 ALL4 AT
Cooper D 2.0 AT
Cooper S
Cooper S ALL4
Cooper S ALL4 AT
Cooper S AT
Cooper SD
Cooper SD ALL4
Cooper SD ALL4 AT
Cooper SD AT
JCW
JCW AT
JCW Euro6 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score27%8%25%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • So ugly that many thought it had character
  • Cute and iconic design
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very tight inside
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Bad drivetrain
  • MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad ZF 9HP transmission
  • Pretends to be "SUV"
  • No powerful engine options
  • Disastrous engine unreliability
  • Ugly black plastic everywhere
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.