Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Nissan Qashqai 3 vs Nissan Rogue 2
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.3 140
1.3 158
1.3 AWD CVT
1.3 CVT
2.0 AWD Hybrid CVT
2.0 Hybrid CVT
2.5 AWD CVT
2.5 CVT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
17.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
18.6 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
25.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door mild-hybrid Crossover
Platform
Nissan CMF-C platform
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1625 mm / 64.0 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4425 mm / 174.2 in
Size | Width
1835 mm / 72.2 in | 2084 mm / 82.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1839 mm / 72.4 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2665 mm / 104.9 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in
Performance
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
EURO 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.3 L / 81.3 cu-in / 1332.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
81.3 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2021
Debut
2021-02-18
Made In
UK
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
3%
37%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Cheap to buy
- Some offroad capabilities
- Improved styling
- Improved interior appointments
Cons
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very ugly
- Horrible build quality
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Only available with tiny engines
- Waste of raw materials
- No powerful engine options
- Bad engine reputation
- Unreliable CVTs
- Poor handling
- MacPherson front suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.