Compare Renault Megane E-Tech Electric vs Renault Kadjar vs Renault Captur
Variants
EV40
EV60
1.2 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 130 AWD
TCe 90
TCe 120 AT
TCe 120
TCe 120 AT Stop&Start
TCe 130
dCi 110
dCi 110 Euro6b
dCi 90 AT
dCi 90 Euro6b
dCi 90 Euro6b AT
dCi 90
TCe 150
TCe 150 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
409 L / 14.4 cu-ft ~ 1478 L / 52.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.2 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door battery-electric SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
200 mm / 7.9 in
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1500 mm / 59.1 in
1607 mm / 63.3 in
Size | Length
4210 mm / 165.7 in
4449 mm / 175.2 in
4122 mm / 162.3 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in
1836 mm / 72.3 in | 2058 mm / 81.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2646 mm / 104.2 in
2606 mm / 102.6 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.4 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.0 sec
Top Speed
160.0 km/h / 99.4 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
76.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
16.0:1
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2021
2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
4%
1%
Pros
- Up to 470km electric range
- Decent styling
- Basic offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- BEV crossover nonsense
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- CMiserably low engine output
- Poor build quality
- Horrible styling
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Both ugly and forgettable
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.