Compare Infiniti QX50 II vs Nissan Qashqai 2 vs Nissan Murano 2
Variants
AWD
FWD
1.2
1.2 Euro6
1.2 CVT
1.2 Euro6 CVT
1.3 140
1.3 160
1.3 160 DCT
1.5 dCi 110 Euro6
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 115 DCT
1.6 dCi
1.6 dCi Euro6
1.6 dCi AWD
1.6 dCi Euro6 AWD
1.6 dCi CVT
1.6 dCi Euro6 CVT
1.6
1.7 dCi
1.7 dCi AWD
1.7 dCi AWD CVT
2.5 dCi AT
2.5 dCi AWD AT
3.5 256 AT
3.5 256 AWD CVT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
895 L / 31.6 cu-ft ~ 1699 L / 60.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
82.0 L / 21.7 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Breakover Angle
17.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
27.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/55 R19, 255/45 R20
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
10.7 m / 35.2 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
218 mm / 8.6 in
Size | Height
1679 mm / 66.1 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Size | Length
4693 mm / 184.8 in
4860 mm / 191.3 in
Size | Width
1903 mm / 74.9 in
1885 mm / 74.2 in
Track Width | Front
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 19, 8.5J x 20
Wheelbase
2800 mm / 110.2 in
2646 mm / 104.2 in
2825 mm / 111.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Top Speed
230.0 km/h / 142.9 mph
Towing Capacity
1361 kg / 3000 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1585 kg / 3494 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
VQ35DE
Engine | Compression Ratio
8.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1997.0 cc
Engine | Power
272.0 hp / 202.8 kW @ 5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
136.2 hp/L / 2.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
380 Nm / 280.3 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct- and multi-port-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
XTRONIC
Production
Availability
2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
53%
14%
28%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Good interior design
- Low official fuel consumption
- Not very ugly
- Marginal offroad capabilities
- Decent engine reliability
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No longer RWD-based
- CVT
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Unreliable engines and CVT
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible styling
- Lethargic to drive
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.