Compare Infiniti QX50 II vs Subaru Forester 2 vs Subaru Outback 4
Variants
AWD
FWD
2.0X
2.0X AT
2.0XT
2.0XT AT
2.5 158PS
2.5 158PS AT
2.5 165PS
2.5 165PS AT
2.5 173PS
2.5 173PS AT
2.5T
2.0d
2.0d CVT
2.5
2.5 AT
3.6R
Limited 2.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
895 L / 31.6 cu-ft ~ 1699 L / 60.0 cu-ft
406 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1525 L / 53.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
545 kg / 1202 lbs
426 kg / 939 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
235/55 R19, 255/45 R20
225/60 R17
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
218 mm / 8.6 in
200 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Height
1679 mm / 66.1 in
1605 mm / 63.2 in
Size | Length
4693 mm / 184.8 in
4450 mm / 175.2 in
Size | Width
1903 mm / 74.9 in
1735 mm / 68.3 in
1820 mm / 71.7 in
Track Width | Front
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 19, 8.5J x 20
Wheelbase
2800 mm / 110.2 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in
Performance
Top Speed
230.0 km/h / 142.9 mph
Towing Capacity
1361 kg / 3000 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Compression Ratio
8.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1997.0 cc
Engine | Power
272.0 hp / 202.8 kW @ 5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
136.2 hp/L / 2.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
380 Nm / 280.3 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct- and multi-port-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
XTRONIC
Production
Availability
2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
53%
34%
41%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Good interior design
- Characteristic H4 engiens
- Symmetric AWD
- Good cargo capacity
- Not as ugly as before
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No longer RWD-based
- CVT
- No powerful engine options
- MacPherson front suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Outdated automatic transmission
- CVT
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.