Compare Peugeot 2008 II (P24) vs Volvo XC40 vs Volvo XC60 (Y20)

Peugeot 2008 II (P24)

Volvo XC40

Volvo XC60 (Y20)

Peugeot 2008 II (P24)Volvo XC40Volvo XC60 (Y20)
Variants
1.2 PureTech 100
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-2008
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
2.4D
2.4D AWD
2.4D AWD AT
3.2 238PS AWD
3.2 243PS AWD
D3 AT
D3 AWD
D3 AWD AT
D5 185PS AWD
D5 185PS AWD AT
D5 205PS AWD
D5 205PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AWD
DRIVe
T5 240
T6 285PS AWD
T6 285PS AWD AT
T6 304PS AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score21%32%33%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Interesting I5 and I6 engines
  • OK-looking for a crossover
  • Good fit and finish
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.