Compare Peugeot 2008 II vs Kia Soul 3 vs Kia Sportage 4

Kia Sportage 4 (QL) Crossover (2016-2021)

Peugeot | Cars

Kia | Cars

Variants

1.2 PureTech 100

1.2 PureTech 130

1.2 PureTech 130 AT

1.2 PureTech 155 AT

1.5 BlueHDi 100

1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT

e-2008

1.6 GDI DCT

2.0 MPI

2.0 MPI CVT

e-Soul 39.2 kWh

e-Soul 67 kWh

1.6D 115

1.6D 136

1.6D 136 AWD

1.6D 136 AWD DCT

1.6 GDI

1.6 GDI Euro6d

1.6 T-GDI

1.6 T-GDI Euro6d

1.6 T-GDI AWD

1.6 T-GDI Euro6d AWD

1.6 T-GDI Euro6d AWD DCT

1.6 T-GDI AWD DCT

1.7D 115

2.0D 136

2.0D 136 AWD

2.0D 136 AWD AT

2.0D 185 AWD

2.0D 185 Euro6d AWD

2.0D 185 AWD AT

2.0 GDI 237 AWD AT

2.0 GDI 240 AT

2.0 MPI

2.0 MPI AT

2.0 MPI AWD

2.0 MPI AWD AT

2.0 T-GDI AWD AT

2.0 T-GDI AT

2.4 GDI AT

2.4 GDI AWD AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1467 L / 51.8 cu-ft

Engine Oil Capacity

4.8 L / 5.1 qt

Fuel Capacity

54.0 L / 14.3 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

16.2 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

29.6 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent

Semi-independent, Torsion

Multi-link

Turning Circle

10.4 m / 34.1 ft

10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Type

Lithium-polymer

Body Style

5-door SUV

Dimensions

Size | Height

1550 mm / 61.0 in

Size | Length

4300 mm / 169.3 in

Size | Width

1770 mm / 69.7 in | 1987 mm / 78.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1815 mm / 71.5 in (mirror folded)

Track Width | Front

1540.0 mm / 60.6 in

Track Width | Rear

1540.0 mm / 60.6 in

Wheelbase

2605 mm / 102.6 in

2670 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0

42.0 m / 137.8 ft

Electric Range

330.0 km / 205.1 mi

Towing Capacity

1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 6d-TEMP

Reviews

Neofiliac score

21%

17%

42%

Pros

Decent styling
Low fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Cheap to purchase

Improved fuel efficiency
Marginal capabilities

Cons

Poor performance
Low build quality
No powerful engine options
Only available with tiny engines
Poor suspension setup

Poor performance
No powerful engine options
Poor handling
Low build quality

Horrible 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.