HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Peugeot 2008 II vs Renault Koleos 2 vs Peugeot 4007

Variants
1.2 PureTech 100
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-2008
1.6 dCi
1.6 dCi CVT
2.0 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi 4x4
2.0 dCi 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi CVT
2.5 4x4 CVT
2.2D
2.2D AT
2.4

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1467 L / 51.8 cu-ft
510 L / 18.0 cu-ft ~ 1686 L / 59.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
620 kg / 1367 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
12.0 m / 39.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
210 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1550 mm / 61.0 in
1673 mm / 65.9 in
1715 mm / 67.5 in
Size | Length
4300 mm / 169.3 in
4636 mm / 182.5 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in | 1987 mm / 78.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1815 mm / 71.5 in (mirror folded)
1843 mm / 72.6 in | 2063 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1864 mm / 73.4 in (mirror folded)
1805 mm / 71.1 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Weight
1790.0 kg / 3946.3 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2605 mm / 102.6 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.353
Electric Range
330.0 km / 205.1 mi
Towing Capacity
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Euro 4
Engine
2.4 l 16V 125 kW
Engine | Bore
80.0 mm / 3.1 in
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
79.5 mm / 3.1 in
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2007 ~ 2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
21%
28%
34%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Coherent exterior design
  • Good towing capacity
  • Fully independent suspension setup
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.