Compare Peugeot 2008 II vs Skoda Kodiaq vs Peugeot 4007

Variants
1.2 PureTech 100
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-2008
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 150 4x4
1.4 TSI 150 4x4 DSG
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 4x4 DSG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 150 4x4
2.0 TDI 150 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 177 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI 180 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 4x4 DSG
GT 186 AT
GT 220 4x4 DSG
RS 4x4 DSG
2.2D
2.2D AT
2.4

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1467 L / 51.8 cu-ft
510 L / 18.0 cu-ft ~ 1686 L / 59.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5 / 7
5
Payload
620 kg / 1367 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
12.0 m / 39.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Size | Height
1550 mm / 61.0 in
1715 mm / 67.5 in
Size | Length
4300 mm / 169.3 in
4636 mm / 182.5 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in | 1987 mm / 78.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1815 mm / 71.5 in (mirror folded)
1805 mm / 71.1 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Weight
1790.0 kg / 3946.3 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2605 mm / 102.6 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

Electric Range
330.0 km / 205.1 mi
Towing Capacity
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Euro 4
Engine
2.4 l 16V 125 kW
Engine | Bore
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2007 ~ 2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
21%
42%
34%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • High cargo capacity
  • Fully independent suspension setup
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.