Compare Peugeot 2008 II vs Peugeot 2008 vs Renault Captur

Variants
1.2 PureTech 100
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-2008
1.2 e-HTP
1.2 e-VTi AT
1.2 VTi
1.4 HDi
1.6 BlueHDi
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 VTi
TCe 90
TCe 120 AT
TCe 120
TCe 120 AT Stop&Start
TCe 130
dCi 110
dCi 110 Euro6b
dCi 90 AT
dCi 90 Euro6b
dCi 90 Euro6b AT
dCi 90
TCe 150
TCe 150 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1467 L / 51.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
165 mm / 6.5 in
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1550 mm / 61.0 in
1556 mm / 61.3 in
Size | Length
4300 mm / 169.3 in
4159 mm / 163.7 in
4122 mm / 162.3 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in | 1987 mm / 78.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1815 mm / 71.5 in (mirror folded)
1739 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheelbase
2605 mm / 102.6 in
2537 mm / 99.9 in
2606 mm / 102.6 in

Performance

Electric Range
330.0 km / 205.1 mi
Towing Capacity
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine | Bore
76.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
16.0:1
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
21%
2%
1%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to fix
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Very ugly indeed
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Both ugly and forgettable

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.