Compare Volvo XC90 II facelift vs Jaguar F-Pace vs Jaguar F-Pace facelift
Variants
B5 235
B5 235 6-7 Seat
B5 250
B5 250 7 Seat
B6
B6 6-7 Seat
Recharge T8
T5
T5 7 Seat
T6
T6 6-7 Seat
T8 4 Seat
T8 6-7 Seat
2.0 250 AT
2.0 250 AWD AT
2.0 300 AWD AT
2.0d 163
2.0d 180
2.0d 180 AT
2.0d 180 AWD
2.0d 180 AWD AT
2.0d 240 AWD AT
20d 180 AT
20d 180 AWD AT
25d 240 AWD AT
25t 250 AWD AT
3.0 340 AWD AT
3.0 380 AWD AT
3.0d 300 AWD AT
30d 300 AWD AT
30t 300 AWD AT
E-Performance 2.0d 163
SVR AWD AT
P400e
D165
D200
P250
D300
SVR
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Payload
723 kg / 1594 lbs
Chassis
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/55 R19, 275/45 R20, 275/35 R22
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
223 mm / 8.8 in
213 mm / 8.4 in
Size | Height
1776 mm / 69.9 in
Size | Length
4953 mm / 195.0 in
Size | Width
2175 mm / 85.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 2071 mm / 81.5 in (mirror folded)
Weight
2227.0 kg / 4909.7 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2984 mm / 117.5 in
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2874 mm / 113.1 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
36.0 m / 118.1 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Geartronic
Automatic ZF
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
82%
68%
Pros
- Great comfort
- Some offroad capabilities
- Good towing capacity
- Rather quick
- Good exterior styling
- Lots of power when equipped with the supercharged V8
- Good performance
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Reliability concerns
- Not a real SUV
- Mid-size crossover nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.