Compare Volvo XC90 II facelift vs Volvo XC60 II vs Citroen C5 Aircross

Variants
B5 235
B5 235 6-7 Seat
B5 250
B5 250 7 Seat
B6
B6 6-7 Seat
Recharge T8
T5
T5 7 Seat
T6
T6 6-7 Seat
T8 4 Seat
T8 6-7 Seat
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT

Capacity

Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Passengers
5
5
Payload
723 kg / 1594 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
21.0 deg
20.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
19.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.0 deg
27.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
235/55 R19, 275/45 R20, 275/35 R22
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
18.8 kWh (gross)
13.2 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
223 mm / 8.8 in
216 mm / 8.5 in
230 mm / 9.1 in
Size | Height
1776 mm / 69.9 in
1658 mm / 65.3 in
Size | Length
4953 mm / 195.0 in
Weight
2227.0 kg / 4909.7 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2984 mm / 117.5 in
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2730 mm / 107.5 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
36.0 m / 118.1 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
0.32
Electric Range
18.6 km / 11.6 mi
50.0 km / 31.1 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Geartronic
Automatic Geartronic

Production

Availability
2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
67%
57%
15%
Pros
  • Great comfort
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good towing capacity
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Reliability concerns
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Poor performance
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.