Compare Volvo XC40 vs Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe C253 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz GLA H247

Volvo XC40

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe C253 facelift

Mercedes-Benz GLA H247

Volvo XC40Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe C253 faceliftMercedes-Benz GLA H247
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
AMG GLC 43
AMG GLC 63 S
AMG GLC 63
GLC 200
GLC 200d
GLC 220d
GLC 300
GLC 300d
GLC 300de
GLC 300e
GLC 400d
AMG GLA 35 4MATIC
AMG GLA 45 4MATIC+
AMG GLA 45 S 4MATIC+
GLA 180
GLA 180d
GLA 200
GLA 200 4MATIC
GLA 200d
GLA 200d 4MATIC
GLA 220d
GLA 220d 4MATIC
GLA 250
GLA 250 4MATIC
GLA 250e

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%63%32%
Pros
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Available with V8 AMG engines
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent interior quality
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly hunchback form factor falsely marketed as "Coupe"
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.