HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Volvo XC40 vs Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Kia Soul

Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.6
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
370 L / 13.1 cu-ft ~ 570 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
410 kg / 904 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
195/65R15
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in

Construction

Body Style
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1661 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4105 mm / 161.6 in
Size | Width
1785 mm / 70.3 in
Track Width | Front
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Weight
1270.0 kg / 2799.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in

Performance

Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
79.2 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
32%
27%
14%
Pros
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Distinct styling
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.