Compare Volvo XC40 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551) vs Nissan Juke (F15)

Volvo XC40

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)

Nissan Juke (F15)

Volvo XC40Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)Nissan Juke (F15)
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.2 DIG-T
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi Euro6
1.5 dCi Euro6d
1.6 113PS Euro6d
1.6 113PS Euro6d CVT
1.6 117PS
1.6 117PS CVT
1.6 94PS Euro6
1.6 94PS
1.6 DIG-T
1.6 DIG-T CVT
1.6 DIG-T AWD CVT
Nismo
Nismo AWD CVT
Nismo RS AWD CVT
Nismo RS

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%27%6%
Pros
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • So ugly it's endearing
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible Renault engines
  • Bad CVT

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.