Compare Volvo XC40 vs Volvo C40 Recharge vs Volvo XC60 (Y20)

Volvo XC40

Volvo C40 Recharge

Volvo XC60 (Y20)

Volvo XC40Volvo C40 RechargeVolvo XC60 (Y20)
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
2.4D
2.4D AWD
2.4D AWD AT
3.2 238PS AWD
3.2 243PS AWD
D3 AT
D3 AWD
D3 AWD AT
D5 185PS AWD
D5 185PS AWD AT
D5 205PS AWD
D5 205PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AWD
DRIVe
T5 240
T6 285PS AWD
T6 285PS AWD AT
T6 304PS AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%20%33%
Pros
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent performance
  • Up to 420km electric range
  • Interesting I5 and I6 engines
  • OK-looking for a crossover
  • Good fit and finish
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.