Compare Volvo XC40 vs Volvo XC90 vs Peugeot 5008 II (P87) facelift

Volvo XC40

Volvo XC90

Peugeot 5008 II (P87) facelift

Volvo XC40Volvo XC90Peugeot 5008 II (P87) facelift
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
D3 AT
D3 AWD AT
2.5T AWD
2.5T AWD AT
T6 AWD
3.2 AWD
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%38%24%
Pros
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good exterior styling
  • Decent styling
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Pretends to be "SUV"
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.