Compare Volvo XC40 vs Nissan Juke (F15) vs Nissan Qashqai 3 (J12)

Volvo XC40

Nissan Juke (F15)

Nissan Qashqai 3 (J12)

Volvo XC40Nissan Juke (F15)Nissan Qashqai 3 (J12)
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
1.2 DIG-T
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi Euro6
1.5 dCi Euro6d
1.6 113PS Euro6d
1.6 113PS Euro6d CVT
1.6 117PS
1.6 117PS CVT
1.6 94PS Euro6
1.6 94PS
1.6 DIG-T
1.6 DIG-T CVT
1.6 DIG-T AWD CVT
Nismo
Nismo AWD CVT
Nismo RS AWD CVT
Nismo RS
1.3 140
1.3 158
1.3 AWD CVT
1.3 CVT

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%6%3%
Pros
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • So ugly it's endearing
  • Cheap to buy
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible Renault engines
  • Bad CVT
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible build quality
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Waste of raw materials

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.