Compare Volvo XC40 vs Nissan Qashqai 3 vs Nissan Juke

Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
1.3 140
1.3 158
1.3 AWD CVT
1.3 CVT
1.2 DIG-T
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi Euro6
1.5 dCi Euro6d
1.6 113PS Euro6d
1.6 113PS Euro6d CVT
1.6 117PS
1.6 117PS CVT
1.6 94PS Euro6
1.6 94PS
1.6 DIG-T
1.6 DIG-T CVT
1.6 DIG-T AWD CVT
Nismo
Nismo AWD CVT
Nismo RS AWD CVT
Nismo RS

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
22.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
25.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in

Construction

Body Style
5-door mild-hybrid Crossover
5-door Crossover
Platform
Nissan CMF-C platform

Dimensions

Size | Height
1625 mm / 64.0 in
Size | Length
4425 mm / 174.2 in
Size | Width
1835 mm / 72.2 in | 2084 mm / 82.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
2665 mm / 104.9 in
2530 mm / 99.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.35

Powertrain

Emission Standard
EURO 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.3 L / 81.3 cu-in / 1332.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
81.3 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2021
Debut
2021-02-18
Made In
UK

Reviews

Neofiliac score
32%
3%
6%
Pros
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Cheap to buy
  • So ugly it's endearing
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible build quality
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Waste of raw materials
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible Renault engines
  • Bad CVT

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.