Compare Jaguar F-Pace facelift vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551) vs Toyota C-HR facelift

Jaguar F-Pace facelift

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)

Toyota C-HR facelift

Jaguar F-Pace faceliftLand Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)Toyota C-HR facelift
Variants
P400e
D165
D200
P250
D300
SVR
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid

Reviews

Neofiliac score68%27%42%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Mid-size crossover nonsense
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Impractical

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.