Compare Jaguar F-Pace facelift vs Volvo XC90 II facelift vs Subaru Forester 5 (SK)

Jaguar F-Pace facelift

Volvo XC90 II facelift

Subaru Forester 5 (SK)

Jaguar F-Pace faceliftVolvo XC90 II faceliftSubaru Forester 5 (SK)
Variants
P400e
D165
D200
P250
D300
SVR
B5 235
B5 235 6-7 Seat
B5 250
B5 250 7 Seat
B6
B6 6-7 Seat
Recharge T8
T5
T5 7 Seat
T6
T6 6-7 Seat
T8 4 Seat
T8 6-7 Seat
2.0 e-Boxer
2.5

Reviews

Neofiliac score68%67%32%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Great comfort
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good towing capacity
  • High cargo capacity
  • Still available with naturally-aspirated H4 engines
Cons
  • Mid-size crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Reliability concerns
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • No manual transmission
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.