Compare Jaguar F-Pace facelift vs Jaguar E-Pace facelift vs Peugeot 3008 II
Variants
P400e
D165
D200
P250
D300
SVR
P160
P300e AWD
D165 MT
D165 AWD
D200 AWD
P200 AWD
P250 AWD
P300 AWD
1.2 130 AT
1.2 130
1.5 HDi 130 AT
1.5 HDi 130
1.6 HDi 100
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 180 AT
1.6 PHEV
1.6 THP 165 AT
2.0 HDi 150
GT 2.0 HDi 177
GT 2.0 HDi 180
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
601 L / 21.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1482 L / 52.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
22.0 deg
20.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
20.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
29.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.1 ft
10.7 m / 35.0 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
15.0 kWh (gross)
13.2 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
213 mm / 8.4 in
212 mm / 8.3 in
219 mm / 8.6 in
Size | Height
1648 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4395 mm / 173.0 in
4447 mm / 175.1 in
Size | Width
2175 mm / 85.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 2071 mm / 81.5 in (mirror folded)
1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror folded)
1841 mm / 72.5 in | 2098 mm / 82.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1906 mm / 75.0 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1624.0 mm / 63.9 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
Performance
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
55.0 km / 34.2 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ZF
Production
Availability
2020
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
68%
35%
21%
Pros
- Good performance
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Low fuel consumption
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Mid-size crossover nonsense
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low build quality
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.