Compare Jaguar F-Pace facelift vs Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50) vs Toyota Venza (AV10)

Jaguar F-Pace facelift

Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)

Toyota Venza (AV10)

Jaguar F-Pace faceliftToyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)Toyota Venza (AV10)
Variants
P400e
D165
D200
P250
D300
SVR
1.2
1.2 4WD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 AT
2.7
2.7 AT
2.7 AWD
2.7 AWD AT
3.5
3.5 AT
3.5 AWD
3.5 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score68%28%24%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption (hybrid)
  • Small turning circle
  • Rather good exterior design (for what it is)
  • Exceptionally reliable powertrain
  • Great fit and finish
Cons
  • Mid-size crossover nonsense
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Just a clumsy hatchback
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Half crossover, half station wagon

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.