Compare Jaguar F-Pace facelift vs Audi Q7 II vs Audi Q5

Variants
P400e
D165
D200
P250
D300
SVR
2.0 TFSI
3.0 TDI 249
3.0 TDI 272
3.0 TFSI
3.0 ultra TDI 218
45 TDI MHEV
50 TDI MHEV
e-tron 3.0 TDI
2.0 TDI quattro
2.0 TFSI 180 quattro
2.0 TFSI 211 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 211 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 245 quattro AT
3.0 TDI quattro DCT
3.2 FSI quattro DCT

Capacity

Passengers
5
5 / 7
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Breakover Angle
13.1 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
31.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link, trapezoidal lever
Turning Circle
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
17.3 kWh (gross)
1.3 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
213 mm / 8.4 in
210 mm / 8.3 in
200 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Height
1653 mm / 65.1 in
Size | Length
4629 mm / 182.2 in
Size | Width
2175 mm / 85.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 2071 mm / 81.5 in (mirror folded)
1968 mm / 77.5 in | 2212 mm / 87.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1679.0 mm / 66.1 in
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1691.0 mm / 66.6 in
1613.0 mm / 63.5 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2994 mm / 117.9 in
2807 mm / 110.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
56.0 km / 34.8 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ZF

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
68%
74%
44%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Mid-size crossover nonsense
  • No more 8+ cylinder models
  • Somewhat generic styling
  • Some questionable styling elements
  • Unreliable petrol engines
  • Unreliable DCTs

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.