Compare Jaguar F-Pace facelift vs Infiniti QX60 vs Infiniti QX50 II

Variants
P400e
D165
D200
P250
D300
SVR
2.5 Hybrid AWD
3.5 262 AWD
3.5 265 AWD
3.5 265
3.5 295
3.5 295 AWD
AWD
FWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
895 L / 31.6 cu-ft ~ 1699 L / 60.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
9.6 L / 10.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.8 L / 5.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
7
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/65 R18, 235/55 R20
235/55 R19, 255/45 R20
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
213 mm / 8.4 in
218 mm / 8.6 in
Size | Height
1742 mm / 68.6 in
1679 mm / 66.1 in
Size | Length
4693 mm / 184.8 in
Size | Width
2175 mm / 85.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 2071 mm / 81.5 in (mirror folded)
1961 mm / 77.2 in
1903 mm / 74.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1669.0 mm / 65.7 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 18, 7.5J x 20
7.5J x 19, 8.5J x 20
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2901 mm / 114.2 in
2800 mm / 110.2 in

Performance

Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Top Speed
190.0 km/h / 118.1 mph
230.0 km/h / 142.9 mph
Towing Capacity
1361 kg / 3000 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Compression Ratio
8.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1997.0 cc
Engine | Power
272.0 hp / 202.8 kW @ 5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
136.2 hp/L / 2.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
380 Nm / 280.3 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct- and multi-port-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ZF
CVT
XTRONIC

Production

Availability
2020
2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
68%
68%
53%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Excellent exterior styling
  • High drivetrain reliaiblity
  • Decent styling
  • Good interior design
Cons
  • Mid-size crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson strut front suspension
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No longer RWD-based
  • CVT

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.