HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Jaguar F-Pace facelift vs Volvo XC60 II vs Volvo XC90 II facelift

Variants
P400e
D165
D200
P250
D300
SVR
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
B5 235
B5 235 6-7 Seat
B5 250
B5 250 7 Seat
B6
B6 6-7 Seat
Recharge T8
T5
T5 7 Seat
T6
T6 6-7 Seat
T8 4 Seat
T8 6-7 Seat

Capacity

Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Passengers
5
5
Payload
723 kg / 1594 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
21.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
19.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Tire Size
235/55 R19, 275/45 R20, 275/35 R22
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
450 mm / 17.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
18.8 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
213 mm / 8.4 in
216 mm / 8.5 in
223 mm / 8.8 in
Size | Height
1658 mm / 65.3 in
1776 mm / 69.9 in
Size | Length
4953 mm / 195.0 in
Size | Width
2175 mm / 85.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 2071 mm / 81.5 in (mirror folded)
Weight
2227.0 kg / 4909.7 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2984 mm / 117.5 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
36.0 m / 118.1 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
0.33
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
18.6 km / 11.6 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ZF
Automatic Geartronic
Automatic Geartronic

Production

Availability
2020
2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
68%
57%
67%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Great comfort
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Mid-size crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Reliability concerns

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.