Compare Jaguar E-Pace facelift vs Jaguar F-Pace facelift vs Subaru Forester 5 (SK)

Jaguar E-Pace facelift

Jaguar F-Pace facelift

Subaru Forester 5 (SK)

Jaguar E-Pace faceliftJaguar F-Pace faceliftSubaru Forester 5 (SK)
Variants
P160
P300e AWD
D165 MT
D165 AWD
D200 AWD
P200 AWD
P250 AWD
P300 AWD
P400e
D165
D200
P250
D300
SVR
2.0 e-Boxer
2.5

Reviews

Neofiliac score35%68%32%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good performance
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Still available with naturally-aspirated H4 engines
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low build quality
  • Mid-size crossover nonsense
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • No manual transmission
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.