Compare Ford C-MAX 2 vs Ford S-MAX 2 facelift vs Chrysler Voyager 4

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100 Euro6
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 Euro6
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182 AT
1.5 ECOnetic 105
1.5 TDCi 120
1.5 TDCi 120 AT
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 Duratec 105
1.6 Duratec 125
1.6 TDCi 115
1.6 TDCi 95
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 TDCi 115 Euro6
1.6 120
1.6 85
2.0 188 PHEV
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140 AT
2.0 TDCi 163
2.0 TDCi 163 AT
2.0 TDCi 150 AT
2.0 TDCi 150
2.0 TDCi 170 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 165
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 EcoBlue 240 AT
2.5 190 Hybrid
2.4 147
2.4 147 AT
2.4 152
2.4 152 AT
2.5D
2.8D AT
3.3 AT
3.3 AWD AT
3.8
3.8 AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
445 L / 15.7 cu-ft ~ 4080 L / 144.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
5
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.2 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
7.6 kWh (gross)
1.1 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1750 mm / 68.9 in
Size | Length
4805 mm / 189.2 in
Size | Width
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
1995 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2649 mm / 104.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2880 mm / 113.4 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
60.3 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
23%
24%
27%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Lots of interior space
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • No in dependent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.