Compare Ford C-MAX 2 vs Toyota Ractis 2 vs Toyota Noah

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100 Euro6
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 Euro6
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182 AT
1.5 ECOnetic 105
1.5 TDCi 120
1.5 TDCi 120 AT
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 Duratec 105
1.6 Duratec 125
1.6 TDCi 115
1.6 TDCi 95
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 TDCi 115 Euro6
1.6 120
1.6 85
2.0 188 PHEV
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140 AT
2.0 TDCi 163
2.0 TDCi 163 AT
2.0 TDCi 150 AT
2.0 TDCi 150
2.0 TDCi 170 AT
1.33
1.33 CVT
1.4 D-4D
1.4 D-4D CVT
4AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
8

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Tire Size
195 / 65R15

Construction

Battery | Capacity
7.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1595 mm / 62.8 in
1850 mm / 72.8 in
Size | Length
3990 mm / 157.1 in
4560 mm / 179.5 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Weight
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6JJ x 15
Wheelbase
2649 mm / 104.3 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2825 mm / 111.2 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
550 kg / 1213 lbs (w/o brakes) | 800 kg / 1764 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
156.0 hp / 116.3 kW @ 6600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
78.1 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
186 Nm / 137.2 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder

Production

Availability
2010 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
23%
19%
17%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good 0.29 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Improved exterior design
  • Interesting styling
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.