Compare Ford C-MAX 2 vs Toyota Sienta vs Toyota Ractis 2
Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100 Euro6
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 Euro6
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182 AT
1.5 ECOnetic 105
1.5 TDCi 120
1.5 TDCi 120 AT
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 Duratec 105
1.6 Duratec 125
1.6 TDCi 115
1.6 TDCi 95
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 TDCi 115 Euro6
1.6 120
1.6 85
2.0 188 PHEV
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140 AT
2.0 TDCi 163
2.0 TDCi 163 AT
2.0 TDCi 150 AT
2.0 TDCi 150
2.0 TDCi 170 AT
1.33
1.33 CVT
1.4 D-4D
1.4 D-4D CVT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
Passengers
5
7
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
175/70 R14
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
7.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1670 mm / 65.7 in
1595 mm / 62.8 in
Size | Length
4100 mm / 161.4 in
3990 mm / 157.1 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
Wheel Size
5.5JJ x 14
Wheelbase
2649 mm / 104.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
550 kg / 1213 lbs (w/o brakes) | 800 kg / 1764 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.3 cu-in / 1496.0 cc
Engine | Power
110.0 hp / 82.0 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
73.5 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
84.7 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
143 Nm / 105.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Production
Availability
2003 ~ 2015
2010 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
23%
39%
19%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Beautiful design
- Good 0.29 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Improved exterior design
Cons
- Poor performance
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- CVT
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.