HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford S-MAX 2 facelift vs Toyota Noah vs Toyota Ractis 2

Variants
1.5 EcoBoost 165
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 EcoBlue 240 AT
2.5 190 Hybrid
4AT
1.33
1.33 CVT
1.4 D-4D
1.4 D-4D CVT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
Passengers
8
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
195 / 65R15
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.2 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.1 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1850 mm / 72.8 in
1595 mm / 62.8 in
Size | Length
4560 mm / 179.5 in
3990 mm / 157.1 in
Size | Width
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
Weight
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6JJ x 15
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2825 mm / 111.2 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
550 kg / 1213 lbs (w/o brakes) | 800 kg / 1764 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
156.0 hp / 116.3 kW @ 6600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
60.3 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
78.1 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
186 Nm / 137.2 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder

Production

Availability
2010 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
24%
17%
19%
Pros
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Interesting styling
  • Good 0.29 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Improved exterior design
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.