Compare Volkswagen Golf 7 Sportsvan vs Mercedes B-Class W246 vs Mercedes B-class W246 facelift
Variants
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 116
1.0 TSI 116 DSG
1.0 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DSG
1.2 TSI 85
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 131
1.5 TSI 131 DSG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.6 TDI 110
1.6 TDI 110 DSG
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI SCR 150 DSG
Golf R
Golf R DSG
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI (OM651)
B 180 CDI (OM651) DCT
B 180 CDI (OM607)
B 180 CDI (OM607) DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 DCT
B 160
B 160 DCT
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI
B 180 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
B 180 CDI DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 Natural Gas Drive
B 200 Natural Gas Drive DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI 4MATIC DCT
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1547 L / 54.6 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Trailing arm
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
98 mm / 3.9 in
Size | Height
1557 mm / 61.3 in
Size | Length
4359 mm / 171.6 in
Track Width | Front
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheelbase
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Towing Capacity
695 kg / 1532 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1400 kg / 3086 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
73.7 mm / 2.9 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
28%
24%
25%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Low official fuel consumption
- Less ugly than before
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Poor performance
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Poor fit and finish
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- 4MATIC nonsense
- Half-hearted product
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.