Compare Renault Scenic 4 vs Renault Modus vs Toyota Ractis 2

Variants
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 160 AT
1.7 dCi 120
1.7 dCi 120 AT
1.7 dCi 150
1.7 dCi 150 AT
1.2 TCe
1.2
1.4
1.5 dCi 103
1.5 dCi 106
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86
1.6 112
1.6 112 AT
1.6 88
1.33
1.33 CVT
1.4 D-4D
1.4 D-4D CVT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
49.0 L / 12.9 gal
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Hatchback
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1653 mm / 65.1 in
1589 mm / 62.6 in
1595 mm / 62.8 in
Size | Length
4406 mm / 173.5 in
3990 mm / 157.1 in
Size | Width
1866 mm / 73.5 in | 2128 mm / 83.8 in (mirror unfolded)
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1602.0 mm / 63.1 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1596.0 mm / 62.8 in
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
Wheel Size
20 in
Wheelbase
2734 mm / 107.6 in
2482 mm / 97.7 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
550 kg / 1213 lbs (w/o brakes) | 800 kg / 1764 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4

Production

Availability
2010 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
6%
19%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good 0.29 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Improved exterior design
Cons
  • Ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling
  • Low build quality
  • Rather bad design
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.