HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare BMW 2 Series Active Tourer U06 vs Mercedes B-class W246 facelift vs Mercedes B-Class W246

Variants
218d
218i
220i
223i
B 160
B 160 DCT
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI
B 180 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
B 180 CDI DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 Natural Gas Drive
B 200 Natural Gas Drive DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI 4MATIC DCT
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI (OM651)
B 180 CDI (OM651) DCT
B 180 CDI (OM607)
B 180 CDI (OM607) DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1547 L / 54.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Trailing arm
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
171 mm / 6.7 in
98 mm / 3.9 in
Size | Height
1576 mm / 62.0 in
1557 mm / 61.3 in
Size | Length
4386 mm / 172.7 in
4359 mm / 171.6 in
Size | Width
1824 mm / 71.8 in
Track Width | Front
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
695 kg / 1532 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1400 kg / 3086 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
73.7 mm / 2.9 in
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Steptronic

Production

Availability
2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score
32%
25%
24%
Pros
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Less ugly than before
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • 4MATIC nonsense
  • Half-hearted product
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Poor fit and finish

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.