Compare Volkswagen Passat Variant B8 facelift vs Kia Optima Sportswagon vs Ford Mondeo 4 Wagon facelift
Variants
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TDI 240 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 4MOTION DSG
GTE
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi DCT
1.6 T-GDI DCT
1.7 CRDi DCT
1.7 CRDi
2.0 CVVL
2.0 CVVL Euro6d
2.0 CVVL AT
2.0 CVVL Euro6d AT
2.0 GDI PHEV
2.0 GDI Euro6d PHEV
GT Euro6d AT
GT AT
1.5 EcoBoost 165
1.5 EcoBoost 165 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 120
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 iVCT 187 Hybrid
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
730 L / 25.8 cu-ft ~ 1605 L / 56.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
10.5 L / 11.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.1 L / 4.3 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.3 kWh (gross) | 9.0 kWh (net)
1.4 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1516 mm / 59.7 in
1501 mm / 59.1 in
Size | Length
4773 mm / 187.9 in
4855 mm / 191.1 in
4869 mm / 191.7 in
Size | Width
1832 mm / 72.1 in | 2083 mm / 82.0 in (mirror unfolded)
2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1911 mm / 75.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1578.0 mm / 62.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1564.0 mm / 61.6 in
Wheelbase
2786 mm / 109.7 in
2805 mm / 110.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Electric Range
66.0 km / 41.0 mi
62.0 km / 38.5 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine
G4NG
Engine | Bore
74.5 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Stroke
80.0 mm / 3.1 in
Production
Availability
2019 ~ 2022
Reviews
Neofiliac score
49%
50%
32%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Decent handling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low official fuel consumption
- Rather good-looking
- Decent interior appointment
- Decent build quality
- Independent rear suspensions
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.